Ask your own documents. Get a cited answer.
A grounded brain for your team’s knowledge — every claim traced to its source, and an honest “I don’t know” when your docs don’t have it.
Private beta — you’ll talk to the person who built it, not a sales team.
✓Behind every reply, we hold ourselves to authored ground-truth answers — accuracy you can inspect, not take on faith.
It doesn’t hallucinate — and we measure it.
Every release is graded on a held-out set of hard, multi-hop questions and an engineered distractor lab. These are the live numbers from the latest run.
Ninety seconds inside the product.
Connect a source, ask a real question, get a cited answer — and watch it abstain when the documents don’t back a claim.
A short capture of the real product.
Your team already wrote the answer down.
The reply you need is buried in a months-old thread, or in a doc that was never written — or written, then left three versions behind. Work moves through too many hands, and the moment more than a couple of people touch something, its real state lives in their heads, not anywhere you can search.
The answer is already in Notion, Slack and the CRM. Atrant finds it and cites the source — instead of leaving you to dig for half a day, or trust a chatbot that fills the gaps with guesses.
Serve competing clients and the line is strict: what you learn for one can never surface in another’s work. Holding it by hand doesn’t scale — and one slip is a contract problem, not an oops.
Real questions, answered the way you’d want.
Priya Shah moved £80k from print to YouTube on 14 Mar to catch the dip — the brief’s £60k digital cap was logged as an exception. [2 sources]
Cocoa COGS on Aster (+12% QoQ) and payment terms on Vela — ranked against plan across 5 filed docs. [5 sources]
On track: closing 30 Jun, terms unchanged, legal signed off 19 Jun. [Pinnacle MSA · #pinnacle-renewal]
A 5×4 grid — one cited cell each, exported to xlsx in a click.
Three causes — late retail placement, a 2-week creative slip, a CPM spike — each traced to the retro, the timeline and a client email. [memo]
Three live for Northwind — endcap, summer display, loyalty — each cited, and scoped to Northwind only.
Three different Q3 revenue numbers across docs? Atrant won’t quietly pick one. It lays out every value, its source, and the gap between them — and leaves the call to you.
One brain. Every surface you already work in.
Ask
Cited answers in chat — or an honest abstain.
Matrix
Docs × questions → one cited, exportable grid.
Slack & Teams
The same brain in-channel, routed per client.
Deep research
An extended run → a long, cited memo.
API / MCP
Call your brain from Cursor, Claude Code, or REST.
Digests
Standing questions, answered on a schedule.
Each client’s brain, walled off by architecture.
Your contract with Northwind says you won’t share their strategy with a competitor. Solara’s says the same — so an answer must never be built, even partly, from the other client’s documents. General search puts every client in one shared index, separated only by who’s allowed to see what. Atrant gives each client a database-isolated brain by default — your team asks freely, and every question is routed to the right one.
No competing clients? The same isolation maps to internal need-to-know — M&A, board material, an acquired unit. It’s there when you need it.
Where each tool leads — and how ours differs.
Each tool is strong at its job. Ours differs at the architecture: a brain per client, cited and abstaining by default.
A database-isolated brain per client, with deliberate, audited, COI-flagged crossings you can prove to counsel. The architecture, not a filter.
Ask in Turkish over an English corpus; answered in Turkish, cited to the English source. TR↔EN today — extendable to other pairs per customer.
Procurement-ready — and specific about how.
Row-level security per client — not shared-index filtering.
Every crossing recorded; nothing editable after the fact.
Anthropic or Gemini, your keys, encrypted at rest.
Hard ceilings so no client runs away with spend.
A single flag keeps data inside your environment.
Compliant and hosted in Frankfurt — nothing leaves the region.
Three steps. No search index to babysit.
Point Atrant at your sources — Notion, Drive, Slack, a contract folder, or a direct upload.
It builds a typed, cited knowledge graph you can inspect — not a black-box blob.
Chat, Slack & Teams, a deep-research memo, or a matrix — same grounded brain.
Straight answers.
How do I know it isn’t confidently wrong?+
It abstains by default — “your sources don’t say” instead of a guess — and we hold answers to authored ground-truth, so accuracy is something you inspect, not a claim you accept.
What can I ask, and where?+
Anything written down in your sources — decision trails, contract terms, renewal status, a CFO-grade Q1 read. It lands where the answer’s shape calls for it — chat, Slack & Teams, a deep-research memo, or a matrix.
Do I use my own AI keys — and what does it cost to run?+
BYOK — bring Anthropic or Gemini keys, encrypted at rest. Per-tenant cost caps put a hard ceiling on spend so no client or workspace runs away with the bill.
Can it run with no data leaving our environment?+
Yes — a single no-egress flag keeps everything on-prem. Hosting is EU / Frankfurt, with KVKK + GDPR posture throughout.
I serve competing clients — how is one walled off?+
Each client gets a database-isolated brain by default (row-level security, not index filtering). Crossings happen only on explicit opt-in, are logged in an append-only trail, and raise a conflict-of-interest flag before any answer shows.
See it on your own work.
Watch it answer, cite, and abstain on your own documents. You’ll talk to the person who built it.
I built Atrant to do one thing well: answer from your documents, cite every claim, and say “I don’t know” instead of guessing. If that’s the bar you need, let’s talk.
— Mert Gözükara, founder